Hack:
Unleash Human Capability – Remove Management Power and Control by Implementing Authentic Trust Based Model
Management concepts, style and notion of role and perceived duty has a lot to answer for when it comes to creating fear and culture of mistrust in organisation. (Henry Mintzberg, cited by Harbour & Row, 1973) narrowed down the role of management to three key functions; interpersonal, information and decision. While these three functions are very broad, essentially, requires interaction with people in order for all three to be successfully effected. This hack sets out to highlight the correlation between mistrust and how managers performed these functions, aiding and perpetuating cultures of fear and mistrust by virtue of applying these concepts, style and notion of management role. The challenge is the realization that management concepts are such a flaw that we may not need it after all because it has been the root of all the dysfunction and failures in organisational behaviour. Human potential and capability is abounded and ready to be tapped. Organisation’s goals and objectives failed to recognised human needs in pursuit of profit sustainability, and competition. Trust is the one thing that changes everything, (Stephen R. Covey, 2004) and ‘without which nothing’ (Ward & Smith, 2003) Without trust in business, business will inevitably fail because trust underpins all that is driving the success of any organisation, especially unleashing human capability and draw out the greatest talents, ingenuity and creativity of their people. (Stephen R. Covey, 2004) The only way to do this is by neutralising the management role and severs its influence in an effort to revive the human spirit.
The Problem
According to (Stephen R. Covey, 2004), one simple overarching reason why so many people remain unsatisfied in their work and why most organisations fail to draw out the greatest talent, ingenuity and creativity of their people and never become truly great, enduring organisations, stems from an incomplete paradigm of who we are – our fundamental view of human nature.. The failure to recognise the four dimension of life; Body, Mind, Heart and Spirit. These four human elements also represent the four basic needs and motivations of all people. As these four elements are neglected, people have choices and will make these choices accordingly. The fundamental reality according to (Stephen R. Covey, 2004) people are being treated as a ‘thing’. And with this ‘thing’, management resort to power and control (carrot-and-stick approach) to manage and motivate. Cultures of fear and mistrust are well imbedded in the domain of organisational behaviour and systems for centuries with full awareness of those very souls that were put there to keep it out. Although not always intended, Managers often resort to this culture as means of exercising power and control, while others in frustration take desperate measures resulted in short term reactionary solutions with high risk failures. Attempts to address problems of fear and mistrust only scrape at the surface while the underlying core issues permeates deeper and ferociously to every layer of the organisation condemning it to a slow but certain death. The paralysis state of these organisations rendered them incapable to cope with the speed of environmental and global changes, and in many cases survived only for as long as there is demand for the inventories. Power and control is now amok as the only solution known to managers. Despite genuine effort by a few decent managers for management intervention, failure is inevitable as systems become paralyse so the next best option is to abandon ship.
The underlying problem is pointed to a very basic error in how organisations view human engagement and the nature of relationship required for this engagement. As (Stephen R. Covey, 2004) argued, while it is important for organisations to identify profit sustainability as a primary focus, profit alone is incongruence with trust concept because such concept requires adoption of the whole person paradigm approach. Organisations abandoned all efforts to nurture this human element in pursuit of profit sustainability, and the consequence is total collapse in integrity values and trustworthiness principles. Moral values take a beating as managers adopt intimidating tactics to curb the spread of the problem. That while the structure maybe of sound and robust physically therefore appear healthy, there is an underlying deep internal problem of mistrust and deceit. The emotional impact starts to affect social capital and both physiological and psychological effects emerge to the surface with the most destructive force that no organisation can escape.
The Solution
The concept of whole person paradigm (S. Covey, 2004), is about treating the pain of mistrust that has marred organisation behaviour for years. Treating the pain requires a change in behaviour which in turn demands fundamental shifts in attitude, habits and belief by the leaders and by recognising the four dimension of human needs and motivation which are; mind, body, heart and spirit. Management status and concept stands to be compromised in this process and thus drive strong opposition and attempts by management to undermine the process. In this situation, it is critical to neutralise the influence of management by declaring management role as detrimental therefore should be removed. (Stephen R. Covey, 2004) argued that fundamental shifts which results in successful change of behaviour always starts with the choice of one person, and this person is often the leader in the organisation. Often it is the Manager who holds the ‘middle man’ role between the CEO and people, therefore effort should be directed at making changes and shifts at the CEO level and make management role redundant. The concept of management such as power and control or the expectation to achieve business objectives such as profit sustainability makes it unlikely that the right choice will be made, and even if the right choice is made, considerable contradictions plays an influential role in the success or failure of such choice.
(Arthur R. Ciancutti & Thomas L. Steding, 2000) pointed out that the ‘them vs. us’ dynamic occurs when people care and have passion about their work and their emotional reactions to the outcomes of their interactions with others. (Arthur R. Ciancutti & Thomas L. Steding, 2000) went on to say that ‘them vs. Us’ is almost always caused by lack of closure, can’t get reliable information, and lack of consultation when making key decisions thus reflect clear link between failure by management to perform management functions identified by (Henry Mintzberg) and the causes of ‘them vs. Us’ conflicts.
The Practical Impact
Management role is made redundant by introducing seamless and non-hierarchical leadership structure
The Risks
To re-define the role of management within the context of authentic trust based model and re-position its place in the context of organisational development as compromise to any demand to retain the status quo.
The Benefits
We will be able to see the new face of leadership, highly innovative and effective personal and professional development of individuals, and lasting influence of the whole person paradigm making profound difference in people relationship and interactions.
References
Aidan Ward and John Smith, Radical Risk Strategies in Business Relationships, 2003.
Ciancutti, Arthur R., Built on Trust : gaining competitive advantage in any organisation / Arthur R. (Arky) Ciancutti, Thomas L. Steding, Illinois , 60712-1975, USA, Copyright, 2001.
Henry Mintzberg, Cited by Harper and Row, 1973, The Nature of Managerial Work, New York, Master of Applied Project Management, The University of Adelaide, Management Roles 87, http://hubpages.com/hub/ManagementRoles, 15/5/2011
Marshall McLuhan cited by Aidan Ward and John Smith, Radical Risk Strategies in Business Relationships, 2003.
Richard Wolman, Thinking with your soul, cited by Stephen R. Covey, The 8th Habit, From Effectiveness to Greatness, New York, 2004.
Stephen M.R. Covey, with Rebecca R. Merrill, The Speed of Trust, Great Britain, 2006
Stephen R. Covey, The 8th HABIT, From Effectiveness to Greatness, New York, 2004.
Other Sources Consulted
Bruce Schneier, Secrets and Lies: Digital Security in a Networked World, 2000
Dennies Reina and Michelle Reina, Trust and Betrayal in the Workplace: Building Effective Relationships in your Organisation, 1999
Francis Fukuyama, Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, 1995
Geoff Mulgan, Connexity: How to Live in a Connected World, 1997
John Marchica, The Accountable Organisation, Reclaiming Integrity, Restoring Trust, 2004
JSTOR: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 51, No 4 (Dec., 2006, pp 535-559, http://www.jstor.org/pss/20109887, 30/4/2011
You need to register in order to submit a comment.