Everyone is struggling to identify a way to make innovation repeatable, sustainable. But, unfortunately most thought leaders make potentially useful innovation frameworks unnecessarily complex. My goal with the Eight I's of Infinite Innovation is to create a portable mental model that organizations can use to guide innovation in a repeatable way.

Problem

Some authors talk about successful innovation being the sum of idea plus execution, others talk about the importance of insight and its role in driving the creation of ideas that will be meaningful to customers, and even fewer about the role of inspiration in uncovering potential insight. But innovation is all about value and each of the definitions, frameworks, and models out there only tell part of the story of successful innovation.

To achieve sustainable success at innovation, you must work to embed a repeatable process and way of thinking within your organization, and this is why it is important to have a simple common language and guiding framework of infinite innovation that all employees can easily grasp. If innovation becomes too complex, or seems too difficult then people will stop pursuing it, or supporting it.

Solution

Some organizations try to achieve this simplicity, or to make the pursuit of innovation seem more attainable, by viewing innovation as a project-driven activity. But, a project approach to innovation will prevent it from ever becoming a way of life in your organization. Instead you must work to position innovation as something infinite, a pillar of the organization, something with its own quest for excellence – a professional practice to be committed to.

So, if we take a lot of the best practices of innovation excellence and mix them together with a few new ingredients, the result is a simple framework organizations can use to guide their sustainable pursuit of innovation – the Eight I’s of Infinite Innovation. This new framework anchors what is a very collaborative process. Here is the framework and some of the many points organizations must consider during each stage of the continuous process:

1. Inspiration

Employees are constantly navigating an ever changing world both in their home context, and as they travel the world for business or pleasure, or even across various web pages in the browser of their PC, tablet, or smartphone.
What do they see as they move through the world that inspires them and possibly the innovation efforts of the company?
What do they see technology making possible soon that wasn’t possible before?
The first time through we are looking for inspiration around what to do, the second time through we are looking to be inspired around how to do it.
What inspiration do we find in the ideas that are selected for their implementation, illumination and/or installation?

2. Investigation

What can we learn from the various pieces of inspiration that employees come across?
How do the isolated elements of inspiration collect and connect? Or do they?
What customer insights are hidden in these pieces of inspiration?
What jobs-to-be-done are most underserved and are worth digging deeper on?
Which unmet customer needs that we see are worth trying to address?
Which are the most promising opportunities, and which might be the most profitable?

3. Ideation

We don’t want to just get lots of ideas, we want to get lots of good ideas
Insights and inspiration from first two stages increase relevance and depth of the ideas
We must give people a way of sharing their ideas in a way that feels safe for them
How can we best integrate online and offline ideation methods?
How well have we communicated the kinds of innovation we seek?
Have we trained our employees in a variety of creativity methods?

4. Iteration

No idea emerges fully formed, so we must give people a tool that allows them to contribute ideas in a way that others can build on them and help uncover the potential fatal flaws of ideas so that they can be overcome
We must prototype ideas and conduct experiments to validate assumptions and test potential stumbling blocks or unknowns to get learnings that we can use to make the idea and its prototype stronger
Are we instrumenting for learning as we conduct each experiment?

5. Identification

In what ways do we make it difficult for customers to unlock the potential value from this potentially innovative solution?
What are the biggest potential barriers to adoption?
What changes do we need to make from a financing, marketing, design, or sales perspective to make it easier for customers to access the value of this new solution?
Which ideas are we best positioned to develop and bring to market?
What resources do we lack to realize the promise of each idea?
Based on all of the experiments, data, and markets, which ideas should we select?

You’ll see in the framework that things loop back through inspiration again before proceeding to implementation. There are two main reasons why. First, if employees aren’t inspired by the ideas that you’ve selected to commercialize and some of the potential implementation issues you’ve identified, then you either have selected the wrong ideas or you’ve got the wrong employees. Second, at this intersection you might want to loop back through the first five stages though an implementation lens before actually starting to implement your ideas OR you may unlock a lot of inspiration and input from a wider internal audience to bring into the implementation stage.

6. Implementation

What are the most effective and efficient ways to make, market, and sell this new solution?
How long will it take us to develop the solution?
Do we have access to the resources we will need to produce the solution?
Are we strong in the channels of distribution that are most suitable for delivering this solution?

7. Illumination

Is the need for the solution obvious to potential customers?
Are we launching a new solution into an existing product or service category or are we creating a new category?
Does this new solution fit under our existing brand umbrella and represent something that potential customers will trust us to sell to them?
How much value translation do we need to do for potential customers to help them understand how this new solution fits into their lives and is a must-have?
Do we need to merely explain this potential innovation to customers because it anchors to something that they already understand, or do we need to educate them on the value that it will add to their lives?

8. Installation

How do we best make this new solution an accepted part of everyday life for a large number of people?
How do we remove access barriers to make it easy as possible for people to adopt this new solution, and even tell their friends about it?
How do we instrument for learning during the installation process to feedback new customer learnings back into the process for potential updates to the solution?

Practical Impact

The Eight I’s of Infinite Innovation framework is designed to be a continuous learning process, one without end as the outputs of one round become inputs for the next round. It’s also a relatively new guiding framework for organizations to use, so if you have thoughts on how to make it even better, please let me know in the comments. The framework is also ideally suited to power a wave of new organizational transformations that are coming as an increasing number of organizations (including Hallmark) begin to move from a product-centered organizational structure to a customer needs-centered organizational structure. The power of this new approach is that it focuses the organization on delivering the solutions that customers need as their needs continue to change, instead of focusing only on how to make a particular product (or set of products) better.

So, as you move from the project approach that is preventing innovation from ever becoming a way of life in your organization, consider using the Eight I’s of Infinite Innovation to influence your organization’s mindset and to anchor your common language of innovation. The framework is great for guiding conversations, making your innovation outputs that much stronger, and will contribute to your quest for innovation excellence – so give it a try.

First Steps

Many organizations jump to ideation too soon. It is important to understand the needs of the customer and the jobs that they are trying to do, but it is also important to anchor your ideation in both inspiration and insight in order for your innovation efforts to have veracity and not just velocity. Organizations wishing to begin using the Eight I's of Infinite Innovation should spend some time gathering meaningful inputs into the ideation process. This could mean commissioning a piece of research with someone like Innovation Excellence to investigate the current relevant industry trends and interesting activities of companies both in your industry all around the globe, but also in relevant adjacent or analogous industries to help you identify promising search areas for potential innovation.

Credits

This hack is based on nearly two decades of work in collaboration, managing change, knowledge management, innovation, project management, marketing, communications, and strategy. It has been influenced by too many conversations around the world to mention every person who has influenced my thinking over the years. I must say however that when you combine the Eight I's of Infinite Innovation along with inputs derived from a Global Sensing Network and possibly some additional research, you should be off to a strong start to your inspiration phase.

Documents

eight-is-of-infinite-innovation.pdf

Images

You need to register in order to submit a comment.

Sort By: Latest Oldest Likes Replies

October 28, 2012 at 1:09pm

Nan Mehta

Nice hack. It shows you put a lot of thought into this. Have you tried this in your own organization yet?

October 28, 2012 at 7:36pm

Braden Kelley

We are continually going through these loops always looking to keep the momentum going and our focus is always on learning as we go and evolving our strategies.

Braden
@innovate

December 17, 2012 at 3:29pm

Richard Ferrers

Very thoughtful stuff Braden. I like the simplicity a lot. And the infinity symbol is a very good metaphor of Schumpeter's restless aspect of innovation. I have also used this in my Value theory of innovation work.

See my blog post here: Value as a resolution of forces: http://valman.blogspot.com.au/2011/05/value-as-resolution-of-forces.html

I would be interested in your comments on my Value perspective, putting customer value before profit: http://www.mixprize.org/hack/focus-customer-value-not-shareholder-profit

December 27, 2012 at 3:00pm

Braden Kelley

I had a really good comment and then my computer decided to reload the page. Argh.

I will try and recreate.

I too believe that value is key to innovation, but my take is slightly different:

http://www.innovationexcellence.com/blog/2011/08/01/innovation-is-all-ab...

I liked how you highlighted that value shifts over time. For me the Value Curves in 'Blue Ocean Strategy' can be quite useful to highlight how different value dimensions can shift over time from being underserved to overserved and how as a result the source of value in the mind of the consumer can shift. This isn't necessarily how they present it, but it's how I use it in my workshops when I talk about value innovation.

For me, innovation is all about value:
- Value Creation
- Value Access
- Value Translation

I also liked your flower with the sources of value.

Keep up the good work!

You're always welcome to join the community and contribute to InnovationExcellence.com

All the best,

Braden

January 8, 2013 at 2:35pm

Richard Ferrers

Thanks Braden. I look forward to engaging with the InnovationExcellence.com community. For any researcher, outreach and getting the message out is an important part of research, as is feedback from professionals in the field. One of my colleagues from UQ Business School is already very active in your community, Tim Kastelle.

Cheers
Richard

December 27, 2012 at 1:22pm

Catalin Cighi

Refreshing to see the focus on value and the attempt to achieve simplicity. I really wish you did not insist on the "I"s to such an extent. I did't want to have to learn the personalized meaning you attach to words such as "illumination" and "installation" as a prerequisite to understanding your argument. When you self-reference these terms in the first section you force me to start skipping ahead to read your attempts at coining new vocabulary - and that no longer counts as an act of simplification in my book. Still, this is one of my favorite posts so far. CC